Comments on: Twitter. Again. http://thatsanidea.org/blog/twitter-again-104.html Coming soon to an ISP near you.... Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:06:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Lawrence http://thatsanidea.org/blog/twitter-again-104.html#comment-84 Lawrence Sat, 31 May 2008 19:53:04 +0000 http://thatsanidea.org/blog/twitter-again-104.html#comment-84 Assumed you'd read it, before commenting: <blockquote>We have deleted accounts for more straightforward violations of the existing Terms. That being said, we are engaged in an editorial review of those Terms to make it more clear what actions we will and won't take. <i>Essentially, Twitter is a communication utility, not a mediator of content.</i></blockquote> They refuse to accept this this website is a social network. That is one example. They see themselves as a communication tool, they do compare themselves to AT&T at one point. Assumed you’d read it, before commenting:

We have deleted accounts for more straightforward violations of the existing Terms. That being said, we are engaged in an editorial review of those Terms to make it more clear what actions we will and won’t take. Essentially, Twitter is a communication utility, not a mediator of content.

They refuse to accept this this website is a social network. That is one example. They see themselves as a communication tool, they do compare themselves to AT&T at one point.

]]> By: Keehun Nam http://thatsanidea.org/blog/twitter-again-104.html#comment-81 Keehun Nam Sat, 31 May 2008 19:44:32 +0000 http://thatsanidea.org/blog/twitter-again-104.html#comment-81 But guess what, Twitter fell for the first time! And are you comparing AT&T and Twitter? If you gave Twitter AT&T's resources (staff, funding, etc) Twitter would take over the world. But guess what, Twitter fell for the first time!
And are you comparing AT&T and Twitter? If you gave Twitter AT&T’s resources (staff, funding, etc) Twitter would take over the world.

]]> By: Lawrence http://thatsanidea.org/blog/twitter-again-104.html#comment-79 Lawrence Fri, 30 May 2008 21:40:50 +0000 http://thatsanidea.org/blog/twitter-again-104.html#comment-79 You have a point, Keehun, and it really makes your previous Tweets make a whole lot more sense. How many times must it fall before it can be considered countless though? It regards itself as a communication tool, not a Social Network. Did BT (AT&T, for you) collapse at the first, second <i>and</i> third hurdle? You have a point, Keehun, and it really makes your previous Tweets make a whole lot more sense. How many times must it fall before it can be considered countless though?

It regards itself as a communication tool, not a Social Network. Did BT (AT&T, for you) collapse at the first, second and third hurdle?

]]> By: Keehun Nam http://thatsanidea.org/blog/twitter-again-104.html#comment-78 Keehun Nam Fri, 30 May 2008 20:53:37 +0000 http://thatsanidea.org/blog/twitter-again-104.html#comment-78 You know, in my opinion, I think twitter knows what its doing, and let's just be patient. Imagine: a kid needs to fall countless times in order to walk, and to learn how to run well. Twitter hasn't fallen before, and let's hope this fluke will make them immune from anything else in the future. You know, in my opinion, I think twitter knows what its doing, and let’s just be patient. Imagine: a kid needs to fall countless times in order to walk, and to learn how to run well. Twitter hasn’t fallen before, and let’s hope this fluke will make them immune from anything else in the future.

]]>